Showing posts with label United Kingdom Independence Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United Kingdom Independence Party. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

European Disunion

Well, after a seemingly endless campaign, the European Union election results are finally in – and many of us will be wishing they had stayed out, as they do not make very comforting reading for anyone who believes in a Europe of peace and unity. The big story of the night is the large number of anti-EU right wing populist parties that did extremely well in elections – particularly the Front National in France, the United Kingdom Independence Party, and the Danish People's Party. All three of these parties won their respective national votes, and all three of them could be called anti-immigrant, xenophobic, and perhaps even racist – in some case, directing animosity towards citizens from other members of the EU.

The voters of Europe (at least those who bothered to turn out, which in most countries was only a small percentage of the population) have spoken, and it seems that they have chosen hatred, division, and mutual suspicion. They have chosen to ignore the decades of cooperation that Europe has achieved under the EU, a state of peace that is almost unknown in the history of the continent. And they have chosen to blame foreigners for their problems – underemployment, the need for more social services, and cultural disruption – rather than looking to the true culprit of capitalism.

Truthfully, we should be against the EU in many ways, but it is the neoliberal capitalist aspect of the EU that we should be fighting. The part of the EU that pushes for privatization of services; that wants to create a common market in services across the continent, allowing companies from rich countries to take over things in poorer places; that subsidizes farmers to the tune of hundreds of millions of Euros a year to produce food that is simply wasted or which inflates prices on the world market; that negotiates unfair trade deals with poorer countries around the world, while colluding with the US to create ever more profit for itself.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the only country in the recent election that seems to be fighting this capitalist EU is Greece, where the left wing Syriza party came out on top of the polls. Greece has been at the epicenter of this neoliberal EU, having been forced to adopt an agreement to slash jobs and services, reduce wages and benefits, and destroy the social fabric of Greek society all to pay back European banks. The Greeks have seen the true face of the capitalist EU, and have responded accordingly by electing a party that specifically opposes that form of Europe, without rejecting the many benefits that greater European unity has given us (although it must be noted that the extremely right wing Golden Dawn party came in third place in the Greek election, so that country is not completely free of ridiculous racist ideas by any means).


It is time for the rest of us to take a lesson from the Greeks. Rather than voting for parties that offer nothing but hatred and which target relatively helpless groups of poor immigrants who are only trying to make a living, we need to develop our own versions of Syriza. Political parties which understand the frustrations of ordinary people, but which also identify the right causes for these symptoms. Political parties which understand that it is the neoliberal capitalism of the EU which is the problem that needs to be solved, not the open borders and freedom of movement. And ultimately, political parties that want a Europe based on equality, fairness, justice, and most of all, unity.

[ European Union election, election results, right wing populist parties, United Kingdom Independence Party, Danish People's Party, cultural disruption, privatization of services, left wing Syriza party, Greek election, freedom of movement ] 

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

The UKIP Mask Begins to Slip

Another week in the European Parliament election campaign, another story of racism and xenophobia coming from UK candidates. These stories are happening so often now it's almost becoming difficult to keep track – the EU elections really do seem to bring out a special type of crazy that doesn't normally get as much attention during national elections.

The main story during the whole campaign has been that of the United Kingdom Independence Party, or UKIP, who are currently polling in second place, behind the Labour Party, but ahead of the ruling Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties. This popularity, however, comes despite an increasing number of scandals and controversies. One candidate recently suggested shooting gay people in an effort to get them to admit that they 'aren't really gay'; another quite openly claimed that people who vote for the other three parties should be executed for treason.

Of course, these people tend to be rather minor figures, often standing only in local council elections rather than as national figures or potential MEPs. However, the leader of the party, Nigel Farage, is himself no stranger to controversy. In an interview with a London radio station this week he reiterated his position that he would not want to live next door to Romanians; when asked by the presenter what the difference was between Romanians and Germans (Farage's own wife is German), he simply replied 'you know what the difference is' – a reply that seemed so openly racist about 'certain groups of people' that even the notoriously anti-immigrant The Sun newspaper called Farage out over it.

Farage's response comes from a long line of 'unspoken racism' that seems to characterize current British discourse on immigration in many ways. Certain people are seen as 'good', and we have no problem with them immigrating to the UK. Americans, Canadians, Australians, and increasingly even Germans (who are seen as industrious and hard working) and, in Farage's case, Indians (who are presumably seen as less threatening due to usually being Hindu rather than Muslim). Others are seen as 'bad', and must be kept out – Romanians, Albanians, Pakistanis, Somalians, branded as uniformly criminals, thieves, and beggars. But none of this is ever said out loud – it is assumed that anyone with 'common sense' will automatically know it, and will understand what Farage means when he says 'you know what the difference is'.

Perhaps the closest this ideology has come to being said out loud comes in another of Farage's statements – he claims he doesn't have a problem with the quantity of people coming into the country, but rather the quality of those immigrants. This is where the mask covering UKIP's racism really starts to slip – the argument, it seems, has nothing to do with the economic impact of immigration on the British working class, or on the cohesiveness of British culture (the usual arguments made for restricting newcomers). Rather, the problem is that some groups of people are simply seen as having less 'quality' than others.


The saddest thing about Farage's comments is that the ideology they reveal is one that is shared by a significant segment of the British population. Many people have complained about the comments, but many more will have heard them and nodded, and said that this is what everyone is really thinking – that some groups of people are more worthy than others, are somehow inherently 'better'. This is a slippery road to start walking down, and can very quickly lead from genuine worries about economics and social issues into full-blown racism and the demonization of people simply because of their homeland or ancestry. But it seems that for now such a path is popular enough to hand UKIP a spot near the top table in the upcoming European Parliament.

[ European Parliament election campaign, United Kingdom Independence Party, UKIP, Nigel Farage, The Sun newspaperб British working class ]