Another oil spill?! This time in Thailand

It’s cleanup Day 6 in Thailand, where one of the country’s largest oil and gas companies has yet to atone for ANOTHER oil spill.

I feel like I’m starting to sound like a broken record – every week, I’m writing about some new oil spill and the havoc it wreaks. When will the world learn?

This past Saturday, a rupture in a pipeline operated by PTT Global Chemical spilled roughly 13,000 gallons (or 50,000 liters) of crude oil into the Gulf of Thailand.

The spill washed up off Samet Island, a resort that draws a million tourists annually to its exotic beaches.

"This is a failure to solve a problem by a company that earns hundreds of billions [of dollars] every year, using the country's natural resources," says Sathit Pitutecha, a member of Thailand’s parliament. "I wouldn't criticize if this was the first time, but it's the fourth time already. Now the people of Rayong have to bear the burden of risk from the industrial sector."

That’s right – it’s the FOURTH spill the company has had to answer for. Back in 2009, a subsidiary of PTT was involved in the Montara oil spill, one of Australia's worst oil disasters.

Thursday, authorities claimed that oil slicks remained onshore. PTT Global Chemical flew oil spill management experts from Singapore to the site, but failed to stop the spill from spreading.

“We've worked day and night to clean up the bay," says Boworn Vongsinudom, President of PTTGC. "It was supposed to be finished, as we aimed, on the third day, but more oil came in from another spot, so we had to take care of it, too."

Stop Global Warming, an environmental advocacy group based out of Thailand, is accusing the company of being ill-informed and ill-prepared for the disaster.

"The transfer of crude oil through the pipeline takes place every day, but when an oil spill happens, PTTGC tackled it with unbelievably limited resources," claims Srisuwan Janya, head of SGW. "This shows their solutions are inefficient and not enough."

PTT is Thailand's largest energy supplier and one of the largest oil and gas conglomerates in Southeast-Asia.

When will the world learn? Fossil fuels are simply too dangerous to lead us into the future. Let’s stop reading about disasters and death, and let’s start reading about technological innovation.

To start, visit nrglab.asia, and check out our slate of alternative energy projects that are sure to take the world by storm. A good storm, that is.

Can't afford another spill

As we approach the 24^th anniversary of the Exxon Valdez oil spill, we must ask ourselves: have we done enough to protect our oceans and beaches from this filthy substance?

According to Art Sterritt, Executive Director of the Coastal First Nations, we haven’t. He summarized the CFN’s position on oil tanker traffic along the coast and the potentially disastrous effect a spill would have on the region’s ecosystem and communities: “If you transpose the geographic area affected by the Valdez spill onto the area tankers would travel down the west coast, a spill could theoretically stretch from Prince Rupert (Canada) to Vancouver (Roughly 1,500 kilometers).”

The Exxon Valdez spill occurred on March 24, 1989. Up to 750,000 barrels of crude oil poured into the Pacific Ocean off the coast of Alaska, the remote location of which made response efforts that much more difficult. Roughly 11 million gallons of oil went on to cover 2,100 km of coastline, and 28,000 square km of ocean.

This had been the largest ecological disaster in American waters, until the 2010 Deepwater Horizon incident. Following an explosion in the Gulf of Mexico, an opening in the sea-floor gushed oil unabated for three whole months! That pumped an estimated 4.9 million barrels of crude oil into the gulf, poisoning hundreds of thousands of marine and coastal wildlife.

But what if these risky long-distance tanker runs and off-shore oil rigs were no longer necessary? We could save millions of dollars in disaster relief. We could save millions of lives. If only energy production was made accessible to the public, freeing them from the big oil companies who’d have no choice but to cut-back on operational costs, including transportation.

That’s part of the reason why NRGLab created the SH-box. Semi-conductive, thermo-generating technology is contained within a small case producing electricity for $0.03 per kW, which is four times less expensive than current rates. Better yet, the battery has a shelf-life of 20 years! That means the SH-box is there and ready whenever you need it.

The box itself is comprised of relatively inexpensive materials, like rare-earth elements and metal oxides, making the box affordable to a wide demographic. By introducing it to market, NRGLab hopes the SH-box will lay a devastating blow to big oil. How many spills is it going to take? How many millions of gallons of water and miles of coastline must mankind destroy before we say, “Enough is enough,” and do away with these bulky, ticking-time bombs they call oil tankers and rigs?

Out with the old, and cumbersome. In with the new, and all-natural. In with the SH-box.